https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465745 The dominant issue was whether interference was warranted with an order concerning enforcement/executability of a foreign arbitral award under s.48, as arising in an appeal framework under s.50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The SC held that it was not inclined to interfere, without adjudicating the merits, and expressly kept all objections on facts and law, including maintainability of enforcement/executability under s.48, open to be urged by the petitioner. The SLP was disposed of with no substantive determination on enforceability. en-us Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jan 2026 17:53:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465745 The dominant issue was whether interference was warranted with an order concerning enforcement/executability of a foreign arbitral award under s.48, as arising in an appeal framework under s.50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The SC held that it was not inclined to interfere, without adjudicating the merits, and expressly kept all objections on facts and law, including maintainability of enforcement/executability under s.48, open to be urged by the petitioner. The SLP was disposed of with no substantive determination on enforceability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465745