<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1728 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465745</link>
    <description>The SC declined to interfere with the impugned order in proceedings concerning enforceability of a foreign award. It clarified that all contentions on merits and law, including the maintainability of enforcement or executability of the foreign award under Section 48 as contemplated under Section 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, remain open for the petitioner. The special leave petition was disposed of without deciding those issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 17:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1728 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465745</link>
      <description>The SC declined to interfere with the impugned order in proceedings concerning enforceability of a foreign award. It clarified that all contentions on merits and law, including the maintainability of enforcement or executability of the foreign award under Section 48 as contemplated under Section 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, remain open for the petitioner. The special leave petition was disposed of without deciding those issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>