https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465748 Non-bailable warrants under the PMLA were challenged as illegal, but the HC held they were a last resort after repeated non-appearance despite summons and prior warrants, and the accused had deliberately evaded process and attempted to flee; no interference was warranted and the warrants were upheld. The ED custody remand was assailed, but the HC found the Special Judge recorded due satisfaction and remand was necessary for investigation, hence the remand order was sustained. The discharge application was rejected because sufficient incriminating material existed and discharge at that stage was unwarranted; the dismissal was affirmed. Alleged breach of s.19 PMLA failed as grounds of arrest were served, reasons to believe were recorded, and production occurred within 24 hours; the petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2026 11:01:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465748 Non-bailable warrants under the PMLA were challenged as illegal, but the HC held they were a last resort after repeated non-appearance despite summons and prior warrants, and the accused had deliberately evaded process and attempted to flee; no interference was warranted and the warrants were upheld. The ED custody remand was assailed, but the HC found the Special Judge recorded due satisfaction and remand was necessary for investigation, hence the remand order was sustained. The discharge application was rejected because sufficient incriminating material existed and discharge at that stage was unwarranted; the dismissal was affirmed. Alleged breach of s.19 PMLA failed as grounds of arrest were served, reasons to believe were recorded, and production occurred within 24 hours; the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465748