<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1571 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465749</link>
    <description>Parallel bail or default bail proceedings were not entertained where an application for the same relief was already pending before the competent Special Court. The High Court did not examine the petition on merits and treated the pending application as the proper forum for determination. The petitioner was therefore relegated to pursue the existing remedy before the Special Court, avoiding simultaneous consideration of identical relief in two fora.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 20:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1571 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465749</link>
      <description>Parallel bail or default bail proceedings were not entertained where an application for the same relief was already pending before the competent Special Court. The High Court did not examine the petition on merits and treated the pending application as the proper forum for determination. The petitioner was therefore relegated to pursue the existing remedy before the Special Court, avoiding simultaneous consideration of identical relief in two fora.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>