<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1729 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465750</link>
    <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Court examined whether the applicants satisfied the twin conditions under Section 45. The allegations concerned laundering of proceeds linked to a paper-leak and unfair-means syndicate in public examinations, supported by the complaint in the predicate offences, ED statements, and other material indicating prima facie active participation. The Court held that custody length alone did not warrant release where the accusations were grave and organised in nature. It found no reasonable ground to believe the applicants were not guilty, and the record did not support a finding that they were unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. Bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 16:27:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1729 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465750</link>
      <description>In a PMLA bail matter, the Court examined whether the applicants satisfied the twin conditions under Section 45. The allegations concerned laundering of proceeds linked to a paper-leak and unfair-means syndicate in public examinations, supported by the complaint in the predicate offences, ED statements, and other material indicating prima facie active participation. The Court held that custody length alone did not warrant release where the accusations were grave and organised in nature. It found no reasonable ground to believe the applicants were not guilty, and the record did not support a finding that they were unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. Bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>