https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465753 Challenge was raised to provisional attachment, issuance of fresh arrest warrants, remand to ED custody, and refusal of discharge under s.227 CrPC, principally alleging non-compliance with s.19(1) PMLA on the ground that "reasons to believe" and grounds of arrest were formulated post-arrest. The HC had declined interference, relying on allegations of large-scale diversion and laundering of funds collected from numerous homebuyers. The SC did not adjudicate the legality of arrest, attachment, remand, or discharge; it issued notice and directed the matter to be heard along with connected SLPs. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2026 20:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465753 Challenge was raised to provisional attachment, issuance of fresh arrest warrants, remand to ED custody, and refusal of discharge under s.227 CrPC, principally alleging non-compliance with s.19(1) PMLA on the ground that "reasons to believe" and grounds of arrest were formulated post-arrest. The HC had declined interference, relying on allegations of large-scale diversion and laundering of funds collected from numerous homebuyers. The SC did not adjudicate the legality of arrest, attachment, remand, or discharge; it issued notice and directed the matter to be heard along with connected SLPs. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465753