<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 79 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49170</link>
    <description>The judgment reviewed an order-in-appeal allowing re-export of goods on payment of a fine. The case involved a passenger&#039;s goods valuation dispute with customs authorities, leading to confiscation and redemption options. The court emphasized the importance of accurate declarations for re-export under Section 80 of the Customs Act, overturning the Collector (Appeals) decision. The Deputy Collector&#039;s denial of re-export was found unjustified, and the redemption fine was adjusted to align with market prices. The order-in-appeal was annulled, upholding redemption for re-export under Section 125 with a reduced fine and a personal penalty within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 79 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49170</link>
      <description>The judgment reviewed an order-in-appeal allowing re-export of goods on payment of a fine. The case involved a passenger&#039;s goods valuation dispute with customs authorities, leading to confiscation and redemption options. The court emphasized the importance of accurate declarations for re-export under Section 80 of the Customs Act, overturning the Collector (Appeals) decision. The Deputy Collector&#039;s denial of re-export was found unjustified, and the redemption fine was adjusted to align with market prices. The order-in-appeal was annulled, upholding redemption for re-export under Section 125 with a reduced fine and a personal penalty within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>