https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465737 A Delhi HC decision on interim injunction in a property dispute held that a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury before restraint can issue. On the admitted succession and partition facts, the property was treated as having devolved absolutely on the defendant's branch, and the earlier bequest did not create ancestral coparcenary property in the defendant's hands. Mere description of the property as HUF property in a return did not by itself amount to throwing it into the common hotchpotch or surrendering absolute ownership. As no sale deed had yet been executed, no breach of the lease condition was shown at that stage, and interim injunction was declined. en-us Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:50:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465737 A Delhi HC decision on interim injunction in a property dispute held that a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury before restraint can issue. On the admitted succession and partition facts, the property was treated as having devolved absolutely on the defendant's branch, and the earlier bequest did not create ancestral coparcenary property in the defendant's hands. Mere description of the property as HUF property in a return did not by itself amount to throwing it into the common hotchpotch or surrendering absolute ownership. As no sale deed had yet been executed, no breach of the lease condition was shown at that stage, and interim injunction was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465737