<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 88 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49164</link>
    <description>The review proposal seeking to overturn the release of confiscated gold biscuits on a redemption fine was rejected. The revisionary authority reduced the fine, citing the passenger&#039;s eligibility to bring in gold and the disproportionate nature of absolute confiscation for non-declaration. The judgment emphasized judicial discretion over administrative instructions in quasi-judicial functions, protecting appellate bodies from binding directives. The decision in a previous case established the authority&#039;s discretion in granting redemption under the Customs Act. The review was dismissed as unnecessary due to the merger of the orders, affirming the reduced redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 88 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49164</link>
      <description>The review proposal seeking to overturn the release of confiscated gold biscuits on a redemption fine was rejected. The revisionary authority reduced the fine, citing the passenger&#039;s eligibility to bring in gold and the disproportionate nature of absolute confiscation for non-declaration. The judgment emphasized judicial discretion over administrative instructions in quasi-judicial functions, protecting appellate bodies from binding directives. The decision in a previous case established the authority&#039;s discretion in granting redemption under the Customs Act. The review was dismissed as unnecessary due to the merger of the orders, affirming the reduced redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>