<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Operational debt payment dispute recorded in information utility leads to rejection of Section 9 IBC insolvency application under 9(5)(ii)(d)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95796</link>
    <description>A Section 9 IBC application by an operational creditor is liable to be rejected where the information utility record reflects a dispute, since Section 9 is a summary remedy for undisputed operational debt and Section 9(5)(ii)(d) mandates rejection upon existence of dispute. As the operational creditor itself produced the information utility certificate showing a recorded dispute, the adjudicating authority erred in admitting the application without addressing that statutory bar; the admission order was set aside and the Section 9 application rejected. Independently, a pre-existing dispute was evident from the corporate debtor&#039;s reply to the demand notice disputing liability, attracting Section 9(5)(ii)(d); the appeal was allowed. - NCLAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:21:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Operational debt payment dispute recorded in information utility leads to rejection of Section 9 IBC insolvency application under 9(5)(ii)(d)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95796</link>
      <description>A Section 9 IBC application by an operational creditor is liable to be rejected where the information utility record reflects a dispute, since Section 9 is a summary remedy for undisputed operational debt and Section 9(5)(ii)(d) mandates rejection upon existence of dispute. As the operational creditor itself produced the information utility certificate showing a recorded dispute, the adjudicating authority erred in admitting the application without addressing that statutory bar; the admission order was set aside and the Section 9 application rejected. Independently, a pre-existing dispute was evident from the corporate debtor&#039;s reply to the demand notice disputing liability, attracting Section 9(5)(ii)(d); the appeal was allowed. - NCLAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:21:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>