<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IBC resolution plan immunity from money-laundering: corporate debtor removed as accused; cases continue against ex-directors, attached assets refunded.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95790</link>
    <description>Section 32A of the IBC was applied to determine whether money-laundering proceedings could continue against a corporate debtor whose resolution plan had been approved and substantially implemented. Since the statutory immunity attaches post-resolution, the corporate debtor was directed to be deleted from the array of accused, while prosecution could continue against erstwhile directors/persons in control and other conspirators/abettors, including confiscation of their own attached assets, if any. The protection was made conditional on the successful resolution applicant being unconnected with prior management and not a beneficiary of proceeds of crime; if investigation undermines this foundation, the enforcement agency may proceed in accord.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:11:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IBC resolution plan immunity from money-laundering: corporate debtor removed as accused; cases continue against ex-directors, attached assets refunded.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95790</link>
      <description>Section 32A of the IBC was applied to determine whether money-laundering proceedings could continue against a corporate debtor whose resolution plan had been approved and substantially implemented. Since the statutory immunity attaches post-resolution, the corporate debtor was directed to be deleted from the array of accused, while prosecution could continue against erstwhile directors/persons in control and other conspirators/abettors, including confiscation of their own attached assets, if any. The protection was made conditional on the successful resolution applicant being unconnected with prior management and not a beneficiary of proceeds of crime; if investigation undermines this foundation, the enforcement agency may proceed in accord.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:11:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>