<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 267 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784511</link>
    <description>Land demarcation and survey are functions of the authority constituted under the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961, not of a liquidator under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Where the liquidation estate had already been identified and demarcated by competent revenue officials, and the sale was limited to that identified estate, no basis existed to compel a fresh survey in liquidation proceedings or to set aside the sale certificate. The appellant&#039;s failure to use the statutory remedies under the survey law further supported refusal of relief. The rejection of the applications was therefore justified and required no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:03:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 267 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784511</link>
      <description>Land demarcation and survey are functions of the authority constituted under the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961, not of a liquidator under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Where the liquidation estate had already been identified and demarcated by competent revenue officials, and the sale was limited to that identified estate, no basis existed to compel a fresh survey in liquidation proceedings or to set aside the sale certificate. The appellant&#039;s failure to use the statutory remedies under the survey law further supported refusal of relief. The rejection of the applications was therefore justified and required no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>