<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 279 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784523</link>
    <description>Interference with the impugned order was declined, but the Supreme Court reduced the costs imposed from Rs.10 lakhs to Rs.5 lakhs. The reduced costs were directed to be paid to the Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Committee within two weeks. The Court also noted that the observations of the NCLT and NCLAT were confined to adjudication of the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:03:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 279 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784523</link>
      <description>Interference with the impugned order was declined, but the Supreme Court reduced the costs imposed from Rs.10 lakhs to Rs.5 lakhs. The reduced costs were directed to be paid to the Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Committee within two weeks. The Court also noted that the observations of the NCLT and NCLAT were confined to adjudication of the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>