<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 282 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784526</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned whether the civil appeal should be decided on merits by the Supreme Court or whether the company petition should proceed before the National Company Law Tribunal. The Court did not examine the merits of the dispute, disposed of the civil appeal, and directed the NCLT to decide the company petition on merits expeditiously. All contentions were kept open, and the parties were allowed to seek interim and final reliefs before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 282 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784526</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned whether the civil appeal should be decided on merits by the Supreme Court or whether the company petition should proceed before the National Company Law Tribunal. The Court did not examine the merits of the dispute, disposed of the civil appeal, and directed the NCLT to decide the company petition on merits expeditiously. All contentions were kept open, and the parties were allowed to seek interim and final reliefs before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>