<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 306 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784550</link>
    <description>Approval under s.80G(5) was denied on the ground that the applicant was a composite trust and thus hit by s.80G(5)(ii). The ITAT held that a trust may validly be of composite character (charitable and religious) and is disqualified only if application of income to religious purposes exceeds the statutory threshold under s.80G(5B); mere presence of some religious objects is insufficient. As the revenue did not controvert the factual assertion that no expenditure was incurred on religious activities, the trust was not a &quot;religious trust&quot; within Explanation (3) to s.80G(5)(ii) read with s.80G(5B). The denial order was set aside and approval under s.80G(5) was directed to be granted, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 306 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784550</link>
      <description>Approval under s.80G(5) was denied on the ground that the applicant was a composite trust and thus hit by s.80G(5)(ii). The ITAT held that a trust may validly be of composite character (charitable and religious) and is disqualified only if application of income to religious purposes exceeds the statutory threshold under s.80G(5B); mere presence of some religious objects is insufficient. As the revenue did not controvert the factual assertion that no expenditure was incurred on religious activities, the trust was not a &quot;religious trust&quot; within Explanation (3) to s.80G(5)(ii) read with s.80G(5B). The denial order was set aside and approval under s.80G(5) was directed to be granted, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>