https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465700 Territorial jurisdiction for a writ challenging the District Magistrate's assumption of jurisdiction and the MSME Council's reference to arbitration under Section 18 of the MSMED Act depended on where the impugned jurisdictional acts occurred. Because the assumption of jurisdiction, conciliation process, and reference to arbitration were all carried out in Delhi, the relevant cause of action arose there and not merely where communications were received. The earlier invocation of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act did not change that territorial analysis. On that basis, the writ petition was not entertainable for want of territorial jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2026 22:17:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465700 Territorial jurisdiction for a writ challenging the District Magistrate's assumption of jurisdiction and the MSME Council's reference to arbitration under Section 18 of the MSMED Act depended on where the impugned jurisdictional acts occurred. Because the assumption of jurisdiction, conciliation process, and reference to arbitration were all carried out in Delhi, the relevant cause of action arose there and not merely where communications were received. The earlier invocation of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act did not change that territorial analysis. On that basis, the writ petition was not entertainable for want of territorial jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465700