<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1757 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465702</link>
    <description>Economic offences involving prima facie organised fraud, large-scale diversion of bank funds, fictitious borrowers, falsified accounts and shell companies justify a cautious bail approach because such conduct affects the financial system and public trust. The Delhi HC treated the applicant&#039;s central role, the risk of tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses and flight risk as outweighing delay in trial, the documentary nature of the record and claimed parity with co-accused. It also held that objections to the prosecution material&#039;s admissibility were matters for trial and not a ground for bail at that stage. Bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 22:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1757 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465702</link>
      <description>Economic offences involving prima facie organised fraud, large-scale diversion of bank funds, fictitious borrowers, falsified accounts and shell companies justify a cautious bail approach because such conduct affects the financial system and public trust. The Delhi HC treated the applicant&#039;s central role, the risk of tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses and flight risk as outweighing delay in trial, the documentary nature of the record and claimed parity with co-accused. It also held that objections to the prosecution material&#039;s admissibility were matters for trial and not a ground for bail at that stage. Bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>