https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465704 Daily-wage workers sought regularization. The SC held that, although Umadevi permits one-time regularization only for irregular appointees who have completed 10 years in sanctioned posts, the matter was governed by the earlier SC directions approving a State scheme for phase-wise absorption of eligible daily wagers, under which the right to regularization subsists until all eligible workers are absorbed, with staggered post creation permissible. The HC correctly found impermissible discrimination where similarly situated daily wagers had already been regularized while eligible others were denied the same benefit. The SC found no ground to interfere and dismissed the appeal, upholding the workers' entitlement to regularization under the scheme. en-us Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2026 22:17:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465704 Daily-wage workers sought regularization. The SC held that, although Umadevi permits one-time regularization only for irregular appointees who have completed 10 years in sanctioned posts, the matter was governed by the earlier SC directions approving a State scheme for phase-wise absorption of eligible daily wagers, under which the right to regularization subsists until all eligible workers are absorbed, with staggered post creation permissible. The HC correctly found impermissible discrimination where similarly situated daily wagers had already been regularized while eligible others were denied the same benefit. The SC found no ground to interfere and dismissed the appeal, upholding the workers' entitlement to regularization under the scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465704