https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49155 The Government of India upheld the penalty imposed on an individual for smuggling goods based on incriminating statements and his own admission of guilt. The applicant's involvement was confirmed by his admission and corroborating statements from others involved in the smuggling operation. Despite the applicant's claim of incorrect evidence, the judgment emphasized the different standards of proof in criminal and departmental proceedings. The penalty imposition was deemed justified, as the evidence supported the applicant's guilt, leading to the rejection of the revision application and upholding of the penalty. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:24:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49155 The Government of India upheld the penalty imposed on an individual for smuggling goods based on incriminating statements and his own admission of guilt. The applicant's involvement was confirmed by his admission and corroborating statements from others involved in the smuggling operation. Despite the applicant's claim of incorrect evidence, the judgment emphasized the different standards of proof in criminal and departmental proceedings. The penalty imposition was deemed justified, as the evidence supported the applicant's guilt, leading to the rejection of the revision application and upholding of the penalty. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 11 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49155