https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465712 Limited liberty granted by the higher court to file a review application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 did not expand into recall jurisdiction or a de novo rehearing. The order treated the liberty as confined to a review that must be maintainable in law, and noted that review is not statutorily contemplated under the Code. On that basis, the application was held not maintainable and was rejected. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2026 22:17:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465712 Limited liberty granted by the higher court to file a review application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 did not expand into recall jurisdiction or a de novo rehearing. The order treated the liberty as confined to a review that must be maintainable in law, and noted that review is not statutorily contemplated under the Code. On that basis, the application was held not maintainable and was rejected. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465712