<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 134 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49154</link>
    <description>The revision application challenging the confiscation of loose diamonds and diamond-studded ornaments valued at Rs. 62,866.90 under Sections 111(d) and 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 partially succeeded. The court released certain goods with clear ownership but upheld the confiscation of items with disputed claims, emphasizing the importance of establishing ownership, origin, and reasonable belief in determining the validity of confiscation and penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:22:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 134 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49154</link>
      <description>The revision application challenging the confiscation of loose diamonds and diamond-studded ornaments valued at Rs. 62,866.90 under Sections 111(d) and 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 partially succeeded. The court released certain goods with clear ownership but upheld the confiscation of items with disputed claims, emphasizing the importance of establishing ownership, origin, and reasonable belief in determining the validity of confiscation and penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>