<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 724 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465696</link>
    <description>Order 21 Rules 97 to 106 of the Code of Civil Procedure require the executing court to adjudicate resistance or obstruction to delivery of possession, including objections raised by a third party, and the court is not confined to parties to the original suit. A sub-tenant can resist execution only if statutory protections under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act are satisfied; where the notice requirements and other conditions are not met, the sub-tenant remains bound by the eviction decree passed against the tenant and cannot obstruct delivery of possession. The execution court was therefore to proceed with removal of the obstruction and determine the resistance on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 724 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465696</link>
      <description>Order 21 Rules 97 to 106 of the Code of Civil Procedure require the executing court to adjudicate resistance or obstruction to delivery of possession, including objections raised by a third party, and the court is not confined to parties to the original suit. A sub-tenant can resist execution only if statutory protections under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act are satisfied; where the notice requirements and other conditions are not met, the sub-tenant remains bound by the eviction decree passed against the tenant and cannot obstruct delivery of possession. The execution court was therefore to proceed with removal of the obstruction and determine the resistance on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>