https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=66573 The defendant challenged Section 44(1)(c) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, which mandates transfer of proceedings to designated special courts to avoid jurisdictional conflicts and consolidate predicate and money laundering trials; the bench declined a separate writ while related review petitions on PMLA provisions proceed, noting a trend of affluent accused bringing premature constitutional challenges during ongoing trials. en-us Tue, 06 Jan 2026 13:46:04 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2026 13:46:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=66573 The defendant challenged Section 44(1)(c) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, which mandates transfer of proceedings to designated special courts to avoid jurisdictional conflicts and consolidate predicate and money laundering trials; the bench declined a separate writ while related review petitions on PMLA provisions proceed, noting a trend of affluent accused bringing premature constitutional challenges during ongoing trials. News - Tue, 06 Jan 2026 13:46:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=66573