<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 1029 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465651</link>
    <description>Long continuous service in work of a permanent nature may justify regularisation through a structured absorption scheme, and such a scheme may be approved with phased implementation where financial capacity and available posts require it. The Court also treated long and satisfactory experience as a valid basis to relax rigid educational qualification requirements for eligible workers at the regularisation stage. For workers who remained unabsorbed, however, the wages fixed under the scheme were upheld and immediate grant of the minimum pay scale of regular employees was declined, as pay parity depended on the facts and the institution&#039;s financial feasibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 1029 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465651</link>
      <description>Long continuous service in work of a permanent nature may justify regularisation through a structured absorption scheme, and such a scheme may be approved with phased implementation where financial capacity and available posts require it. The Court also treated long and satisfactory experience as a valid basis to relax rigid educational qualification requirements for eligible workers at the regularisation stage. For workers who remained unabsorbed, however, the wages fixed under the scheme were upheld and immediate grant of the minimum pay scale of regular employees was declined, as pay parity depended on the facts and the institution&#039;s financial feasibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>