<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1753 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465655</link>
    <description>A foreign award cannot be enforced against entities or individuals who were neither parties to the arbitration agreement nor to the award, because the executing court cannot go beyond the award or treat strangers as judgment debtors absent proof that they are legal representatives or authorised representatives. The corporate veil may be lifted in execution only on a strict showing of control coupled with impropriety, where the company structure is used as a device to conceal or evade liability. Common directors, related business activity, or allegations of fund diversion were held insufficient on the stated facts to fasten personal liability on associated companies and directors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 20:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1753 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465655</link>
      <description>A foreign award cannot be enforced against entities or individuals who were neither parties to the arbitration agreement nor to the award, because the executing court cannot go beyond the award or treat strangers as judgment debtors absent proof that they are legal representatives or authorised representatives. The corporate veil may be lifted in execution only on a strict showing of control coupled with impropriety, where the company structure is used as a device to conceal or evade liability. Common directors, related business activity, or allegations of fund diversion were held insufficient on the stated facts to fasten personal liability on associated companies and directors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>