https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465657 Section 174-A IPC proceedings were held to fall within the bar in Section 195 CrPC, so cognizance could not rest on a police FIR alone and required a written complaint by the concerned public servant or court. The proclamation orders were also unsustainable because the record did not show strict compliance with Section 82 CrPC, including the required satisfaction, publication, and reasoned judicial order before invoking criminal liability. The consequential FIR and proceedings were quashed for failure to demonstrate the statutory safeguards affecting personal liberty. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jan 2026 20:18:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465657 Section 174-A IPC proceedings were held to fall within the bar in Section 195 CrPC, so cognizance could not rest on a police FIR alone and required a written complaint by the concerned public servant or court. The proclamation orders were also unsustainable because the record did not show strict compliance with Section 82 CrPC, including the required satisfaction, publication, and reasoned judicial order before invoking criminal liability. The consequential FIR and proceedings were quashed for failure to demonstrate the statutory safeguards affecting personal liberty. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465657