<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1516 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465661</link>
    <description>Enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused under Section 48(2)(b) only on a narrow public policy ground, confined to the most basic notions of morality or justice. Allegations of arbitral bias, conflict of interest, or nondisclosure must meet a high threshold, and domestic standards of review cannot be imported at the enforcement stage. Where the seat is abroad, objections of this kind are generally expected to be raised before the supervisory court at the seat. Applying the IBA Guidelines and the facts, the Court found no credible conflict, no breach of disclosure duty, and no material impairment of independence or impartiality; enforcement was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 20:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1516 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465661</link>
      <description>Enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused under Section 48(2)(b) only on a narrow public policy ground, confined to the most basic notions of morality or justice. Allegations of arbitral bias, conflict of interest, or nondisclosure must meet a high threshold, and domestic standards of review cannot be imported at the enforcement stage. Where the seat is abroad, objections of this kind are generally expected to be raised before the supervisory court at the seat. Applying the IBA Guidelines and the facts, the Court found no credible conflict, no breach of disclosure duty, and no material impairment of independence or impartiality; enforcement was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>