<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1566 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465666</link>
    <description>Prolonged incarceration in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act prosecution, combined with a trial unlikely to conclude soon, justified relaxation of the statute&#039;s bail rigours. The court noted that investigation against other co-accused was still pending, the complaint involved voluminous material and many witnesses, and continued detention would not serve any immediate trial purpose. It also accepted that the petitioner required specialised medical care and treated him as a sick person for bail consideration. As no material supported claims of prejudice to investigation or witness intimidation, bail was granted and further pre-trial detention was held unwarranted, subject to the Special Court&#039;s terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 16:46:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1566 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465666</link>
      <description>Prolonged incarceration in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act prosecution, combined with a trial unlikely to conclude soon, justified relaxation of the statute&#039;s bail rigours. The court noted that investigation against other co-accused was still pending, the complaint involved voluminous material and many witnesses, and continued detention would not serve any immediate trial purpose. It also accepted that the petitioner required specialised medical care and treated him as a sick person for bail consideration. As no material supported claims of prejudice to investigation or witness intimidation, bail was granted and further pre-trial detention was held unwarranted, subject to the Special Court&#039;s terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>