<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 210 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784454</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment under the PMLA is said to survive where the scheduled offence proceedings are not finally terminated against all concerned persons. The text explains that money-laundering action generally cannot continue once the person is finally absolved in the predicate offence by discharge, acquittal, or quashing, but that protection did not apply here because all appellants had not been finally absolved and a principal accused still faced pending scheduled offence proceedings. It further states that PMLA attachment is not limited only to the named accused in the scheduled offence and may continue against a person connected with the proceeds of crime. On that basis, the attachment was upheld and the appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 210 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784454</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment under the PMLA is said to survive where the scheduled offence proceedings are not finally terminated against all concerned persons. The text explains that money-laundering action generally cannot continue once the person is finally absolved in the predicate offence by discharge, acquittal, or quashing, but that protection did not apply here because all appellants had not been finally absolved and a principal accused still faced pending scheduled offence proceedings. It further states that PMLA attachment is not limited only to the named accused in the scheduled offence and may continue against a person connected with the proceeds of crime. On that basis, the attachment was upheld and the appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>