https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784455 Under the money-laundering bail restrictions, the court treated the statutory satisfaction as prima facie and not a finding of guilt. It found no demonstrated official role, no direct documentary link to procurement decisions or identifiable proceeds of crime, and no specific custodial necessity after documentary and digital material had already been secured. The court also considered the absence of summons before arrest, the selective non-arrest of certain co-accused, parity with similarly placed accused, prolonged custody, and the likelihood of a protracted trial. Continued detention was viewed as disproportionate under Article 21, and bail was granted subject to conditions. en-us Fri, 02 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:47:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784455 Under the money-laundering bail restrictions, the court treated the statutory satisfaction as prima facie and not a finding of guilt. It found no demonstrated official role, no direct documentary link to procurement decisions or identifiable proceeds of crime, and no specific custodial necessity after documentary and digital material had already been secured. The court also considered the absence of summons before arrest, the selective non-arrest of certain co-accused, parity with similarly placed accused, prolonged custody, and the likelihood of a protracted trial. Continued detention was viewed as disproportionate under Article 21, and bail was granted subject to conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 02 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784455