<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 37 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49134</link>
    <description>Storage loss of molasses caused by overflow in the tank was condoned where clearance could not be effected despite repeated efforts and permission for open-market sale had been sought. The material showed that non-lifting by allottees led to the shortage, and the Controller of Molasses, as the sole distributing authority, did not act on the requests made. On those facts, the loss was treated as having occurred beyond the assessee&#039;s control, with consequential relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:48:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 37 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49134</link>
      <description>Storage loss of molasses caused by overflow in the tank was condoned where clearance could not be effected despite repeated efforts and permission for open-market sale had been sought. The material showed that non-lifting by allottees led to the shortage, and the Controller of Molasses, as the sole distributing authority, did not act on the requests made. On those facts, the loss was treated as having occurred beyond the assessee&#039;s control, with consequential relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>