https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784460 Once an approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has attained finality and the available statutory remedies against its approval are not pursued, it cannot be challenged indirectly in collateral proceedings. The Court held that later appellate interference could not reopen issues already concluded, and that the approved plan remained independent of the impugned appellate order. The appeal was therefore not maintainable to the extent it sought indirect disturbance of the finalised resolution plan, and the challenge failed. en-us Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:47:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784460 Once an approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has attained finality and the available statutory remedies against its approval are not pursued, it cannot be challenged indirectly in collateral proceedings. The Court held that later appellate interference could not reopen issues already concluded, and that the approved plan remained independent of the impugned appellate order. The appeal was therefore not maintainable to the extent it sought indirect disturbance of the finalised resolution plan, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784460