<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 60 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49132</link>
    <description>An imported video camera treated as baggage was considered for re-export rather than redemption for home consumption. The request was limited to changing the mode of redemption, and the circumstances were found suitable for a lenient view. The earlier redemption fine was retained, and re-export of the camera was permitted on payment of the same fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 60 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49132</link>
      <description>An imported video camera treated as baggage was considered for re-export rather than redemption for home consumption. The request was limited to changing the mode of redemption, and the circumstances were found suitable for a lenient view. The earlier redemption fine was retained, and re-export of the camera was permitted on payment of the same fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>