<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784486</link>
    <description>Deduction under s.36(1)(viii) was allowed as the taxpayer, a financial corporation, was engaged in long-term financing of projects in new and renewable energy, falling within &quot;development of infrastructure facility&quot; and thus &quot;eligible business&quot;; CBDT approval was not required post 01.04.2000 due to omission of the proviso, and past approvals/departmental acceptance supported eligibility, so the disallowance was reversed. Recharacterisation of various receipts as &quot;income from other sources&quot; was rejected because the interest and fee streams, refunds/write-backs, swap gains, grants surplus, and reversals were inextricably linked to financing operations or taxable under s.41(1), hence assessable as business income. Disallowance under s.14A was deleted for lack of AO&#039;s recorded satisfaction and absence of exempt income. Depreciation was allowed on beneficial ownership and consistent allowance. Disallowance for short TDS under s.40(a)(ia) was held inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 16:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784486</link>
      <description>Deduction under s.36(1)(viii) was allowed as the taxpayer, a financial corporation, was engaged in long-term financing of projects in new and renewable energy, falling within &quot;development of infrastructure facility&quot; and thus &quot;eligible business&quot;; CBDT approval was not required post 01.04.2000 due to omission of the proviso, and past approvals/departmental acceptance supported eligibility, so the disallowance was reversed. Recharacterisation of various receipts as &quot;income from other sources&quot; was rejected because the interest and fee streams, refunds/write-backs, swap gains, grants surplus, and reversals were inextricably linked to financing operations or taxable under s.41(1), hence assessable as business income. Disallowance under s.14A was deleted for lack of AO&#039;s recorded satisfaction and absence of exempt income. Depreciation was allowed on beneficial ownership and consistent allowance. Disallowance for short TDS under s.40(a)(ia) was held inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>