<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 42 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49131</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and referred the cases to the Assistant Collector for a fresh decision. It directed the Assistant Collector to provide necessary details of short-landings, hear the respondents, consider their evidence and pleas, and impose a penalty only if not objectively satisfied with the explanations. Penalties should be based on the duty involved, not the compensations paid by Air India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 42 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49131</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and referred the cases to the Assistant Collector for a fresh decision. It directed the Assistant Collector to provide necessary details of short-landings, hear the respondents, consider their evidence and pleas, and impose a penalty only if not objectively satisfied with the explanations. Penalties should be based on the duty involved, not the compensations paid by Air India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>