<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 245 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784489</link>
    <description>Interpretation of ss. 10A(7B) and 10AA: on insertion of s. 10A(7B), all SEZ units fall under s. 10AA; an SEZ unit cannot claim an additional five-year deduction after exhausting the original ten-year block, and is eligible only for the unexpired portion of ten consecutive years; deduction for the relevant AY under s. 10AA(1)(i) was allowed subject to statutory conditions. Scope of &quot;export&quot; for s. 10AA: only the restrictive definition in Explanation 1 applies; supplies to DTA/other SEZ/EOU were excluded; computation was remanded to AO accordingly. s. 35(2AB): absence of Form 3CL during assessment could not by itself defeat the claim; matter remanded for verification and allowance if valid. s. 14A: with no exempt income and sufficient interest-free funds, disallowance was deleted. s. 36(1)(iii): no nexus shown and own funds exceeded advances, so disallowance was deleted. PF/ESI: payment on next working day due to holiday was allowed; balance sustained. Prior-period income: alleged double reduction was rejected and addition deleted. Bad debts and pre-clinical test provision: remanded for verification of fresh evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 245 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784489</link>
      <description>Interpretation of ss. 10A(7B) and 10AA: on insertion of s. 10A(7B), all SEZ units fall under s. 10AA; an SEZ unit cannot claim an additional five-year deduction after exhausting the original ten-year block, and is eligible only for the unexpired portion of ten consecutive years; deduction for the relevant AY under s. 10AA(1)(i) was allowed subject to statutory conditions. Scope of &quot;export&quot; for s. 10AA: only the restrictive definition in Explanation 1 applies; supplies to DTA/other SEZ/EOU were excluded; computation was remanded to AO accordingly. s. 35(2AB): absence of Form 3CL during assessment could not by itself defeat the claim; matter remanded for verification and allowance if valid. s. 14A: with no exempt income and sufficient interest-free funds, disallowance was deleted. s. 36(1)(iii): no nexus shown and own funds exceeded advances, so disallowance was deleted. PF/ESI: payment on next working day due to holiday was allowed; balance sustained. Prior-period income: alleged double reduction was rejected and addition deleted. Bad debts and pre-clinical test provision: remanded for verification of fresh evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>