https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49130 The appellate order allowing redemption of confiscated gold bangles on payment of fine and permitting re-shipment was upheld. The absence of declaration under Section 77 of the Customs Act did not by itself make the order defective, and an alleged self-incriminating statement did not establish any irregularity in the relief granted. It was also noted that Section 125 permits redemption and re-export on payment of fine even where the goods were not declared, and the redemption fine was not shown to be unreasonable. Review was therefore not warranted. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:30:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49130 The appellate order allowing redemption of confiscated gold bangles on payment of fine and permitting re-shipment was upheld. The absence of declaration under Section 77 of the Customs Act did not by itself make the order defective, and an alleged self-incriminating statement did not establish any irregularity in the relief granted. It was also noted that Section 125 permits redemption and re-export on payment of fine even where the goods were not declared, and the redemption fine was not shown to be unreasonable. Review was therefore not warranted. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49130