<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Search assessment penalty under s. 271AAB(1A)(b) based only on retracted s. 132(4) statement deleted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95767</link>
    <description>Penalty under s. 271AAB(1A)(b) was held unsustainable where the search did not unearth any incriminating material evidencing &quot;undisclosed income&quot; and the only basis was a statement under s. 132(4) offering additional income that was later retracted and was not reflected in the return for the relevant year. Since discovery of undisclosed income during or as a result of the search is a sine qua non for invoking s. 271AAB(1A)(b), a mere admission without corroborative seized material could not support penalty. Accordingly, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:47:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:48:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Search assessment penalty under s. 271AAB(1A)(b) based only on retracted s. 132(4) statement deleted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95767</link>
      <description>Penalty under s. 271AAB(1A)(b) was held unsustainable where the search did not unearth any incriminating material evidencing &quot;undisclosed income&quot; and the only basis was a statement under s. 132(4) offering additional income that was later retracted and was not reflected in the return for the relevant year. Since discovery of undisclosed income during or as a result of the search is a sine qua non for invoking s. 271AAB(1A)(b), a mere admission without corroborative seized material could not support penalty. Accordingly, deletion of the penalty was upheld and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 08:47:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>