<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 110 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49126</link>
    <description>Personal and household effects under the baggage rules are confined to articles ordinarily required for immediate personal use or for running a household. A photocopier and a personal computer do not fall within that description merely because they are not expressly excluded, and technologically sophisticated goods are not treated as personal effects on that basis alone. The alternative claim that such goods qualify as professional goods also depends on proof of entitlement under the relevant baggage provision, and that entitlement must be established on the facts. The operative result described is that free importation was not accepted and duty liability remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:25:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 110 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49126</link>
      <description>Personal and household effects under the baggage rules are confined to articles ordinarily required for immediate personal use or for running a household. A photocopier and a personal computer do not fall within that description merely because they are not expressly excluded, and technologically sophisticated goods are not treated as personal effects on that basis alone. The alternative claim that such goods qualify as professional goods also depends on proof of entitlement under the relevant baggage provision, and that entitlement must be established on the facts. The operative result described is that free importation was not accepted and duty liability remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>