<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Real-estate project revenue recognition and stamp-value mismatch u/s 43CA: unilateral method change rejected, additions deleted, appeal dismissed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95726</link>
    <description>Where the tax authority replaced the consistently accepted project completion method with percentage completion for a single year to tax alleged undisclosed profit admitted in a sworn statement, the tribunal held that, absent any change in facts or law, the revenue could not unilaterally substitute the method of revenue recognition, and an addition based only on a survey/statement without corroborative evidence was unsustainable; the deletion of the undisclosed-profit addition was upheld. On stamp valuation adjustment, the tribunal held the 10% tolerance band in the amended proviso to section 43CA(1) is curative and applies retrospectively; since the variation was 7%, the section 43CA addition was deleted. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Real-estate project revenue recognition and stamp-value mismatch u/s 43CA: unilateral method change rejected, additions deleted, appeal dismissed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95726</link>
      <description>Where the tax authority replaced the consistently accepted project completion method with percentage completion for a single year to tax alleged undisclosed profit admitted in a sworn statement, the tribunal held that, absent any change in facts or law, the revenue could not unilaterally substitute the method of revenue recognition, and an addition based only on a survey/statement without corroborative evidence was unsustainable; the deletion of the undisclosed-profit addition was upheld. On stamp valuation adjustment, the tribunal held the 10% tolerance band in the amended proviso to section 43CA(1) is curative and applies retrospectively; since the variation was 7%, the section 43CA addition was deleted. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>