<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 157 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49108</link>
    <description>The judgment involved a review proposal against the rejection of a drawback claim under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning the export of Cashew Kernels packed in imported OTS cans. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) accepted the claimant&#039;s argument based on examination reports verifying the goods&#039; identity with imported samples. The central issue was the interpretation of Section 74 regarding the identity of exported goods, emphasizing the distinction between re-exporting exact goods and exporting them as part of a manufacturing process. The government annulled the order-in-appeal and reinstated the original order, supporting the detailed analysis in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 157 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49108</link>
      <description>The judgment involved a review proposal against the rejection of a drawback claim under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning the export of Cashew Kernels packed in imported OTS cans. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) accepted the claimant&#039;s argument based on examination reports verifying the goods&#039; identity with imported samples. The central issue was the interpretation of Section 74 regarding the identity of exported goods, emphasizing the distinction between re-exporting exact goods and exporting them as part of a manufacturing process. The government annulled the order-in-appeal and reinstated the original order, supporting the detailed analysis in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>