https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465647 Storage of prohibited gutka and pan masala intended for sale was treated as capable of attracting Section 328 IPC, where the material showed seizure of a large quantity, false denial of possession, and circumstances suggesting a wider supply network. The Court preferred the contrary Division Bench reasoning, noted that the earlier view relied on by the applicant had been stayed, and held that the need to trace the source and purchasers justified custodial interrogation. Anticipatory bail was therefore refused and pre-arrest protection declined. en-us Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:21:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465647 Storage of prohibited gutka and pan masala intended for sale was treated as capable of attracting Section 328 IPC, where the material showed seizure of a large quantity, false denial of possession, and circumstances suggesting a wider supply network. The Court preferred the contrary Division Bench reasoning, noted that the earlier view relied on by the applicant had been stayed, and held that the need to trace the source and purchasers justified custodial interrogation. Anticipatory bail was therefore refused and pre-arrest protection declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465647