<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 76 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49103</link>
    <description>The Government held that items exported by M/s. MADURA COATS LTD. were not covered under sub-serial No. 2502 of the Drawback Schedule, emphasizing that predominance should imply domination over another variety and cannot mean complete exclusion. The impugned orders in appeal were set aside, and the original orders were restored. Two additional revision applications related to similar claims were also rejected in line with the main review case&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:01:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 76 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49103</link>
      <description>The Government held that items exported by M/s. MADURA COATS LTD. were not covered under sub-serial No. 2502 of the Drawback Schedule, emphasizing that predominance should imply domination over another variety and cannot mean complete exclusion. The impugned orders in appeal were set aside, and the original orders were restored. Two additional revision applications related to similar claims were also rejected in line with the main review case&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>