<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 127 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784371</link>
    <description>Fees paid for increase in authorised share capital were directly debited to retained earnings and reflected in the balance sheet under other equity, while the assessee did not claim them as revenue expenditure in the profit and loss account. On that basis, a disallowance made through adjustment under section 143(1) could not be sustained merely because the tax audit report noted the item. The disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 127 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784371</link>
      <description>Fees paid for increase in authorised share capital were directly debited to retained earnings and reflected in the balance sheet under other equity, while the assessee did not claim them as revenue expenditure in the profit and loss account. On that basis, a disallowance made through adjustment under section 143(1) could not be sustained merely because the tax audit report noted the item. The disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>