<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 141 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784385</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether the ITAT has jurisdiction under s.254 of the Income-tax Act to stay operation of an order under appeal even where no subsisting tax demand exists. Relying on SC authority that an appellate forum has inherent/incidental powers necessary to make its appellate jurisdiction effective, the HC held that the ITAT&#039;s power to grant stay is ancillary to its appellate function and is not confined to stay of demand alone. The ITAT&#039;s refusal to entertain the stay application on the ground that no demand had arisen and that it lacked jurisdiction was held legally unsustainable; the impugned order was set aside and the stay application was remitted to the ITAT for fresh consideration during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 08:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 141 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784385</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether the ITAT has jurisdiction under s.254 of the Income-tax Act to stay operation of an order under appeal even where no subsisting tax demand exists. Relying on SC authority that an appellate forum has inherent/incidental powers necessary to make its appellate jurisdiction effective, the HC held that the ITAT&#039;s power to grant stay is ancillary to its appellate function and is not confined to stay of demand alone. The ITAT&#039;s refusal to entertain the stay application on the ground that no demand had arisen and that it lacked jurisdiction was held legally unsustainable; the impugned order was set aside and the stay application was remitted to the ITAT for fresh consideration during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>