https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465620 The dominant issue was whether the writ petition seeking waiver of demurrage/detention charges and permission to re-export should be adjudicated on merits after the customs authority passed an order permitting re-export subject to statutory fines. The HC accepted that the competent customs authority had already permitted re-export under s.125 of the Customs Act, 1962 on payment of a fine and had imposed a penalty under s.112(a), rendering further writ relief unnecessary. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the laboratory analysis report and, if aggrieved, the adjudication order in appropriate appellate or other proceedings. en-us Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jan 2026 12:14:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465620 The dominant issue was whether the writ petition seeking waiver of demurrage/detention charges and permission to re-export should be adjudicated on merits after the customs authority passed an order permitting re-export subject to statutory fines. The HC accepted that the competent customs authority had already permitted re-export under s.125 of the Customs Act, 1962 on payment of a fine and had imposed a penalty under s.112(a), rendering further writ relief unnecessary. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the laboratory analysis report and, if aggrieved, the adjudication order in appropriate appellate or other proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465620