<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1245 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465620</link>
    <description>Customs authorities permitted re-export of the goods on payment of a redemption fine under section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, and imposed a penalty under section 112(a). The writ petition was then withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the report of analysis in appeal before the competent authority and to assail the customs order in appropriate proceedings if aggrieved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 12:14:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1245 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465620</link>
      <description>Customs authorities permitted re-export of the goods on payment of a redemption fine under section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, and imposed a penalty under section 112(a). The writ petition was then withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the report of analysis in appeal before the competent authority and to assail the customs order in appropriate proceedings if aggrieved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>