<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1411 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465622</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was estimation of business income where the AO, following a special audit under s. 142(2A), and the CIT(A) applied profit at 15% of gross sales and made/deleted allied expenditure adjustments. The ITAT held that, on the facts, a net profit rate of 8% on the declared gross sales was reasonable, and since income was estimated on a net basis, no further deductions for depreciation or interest were allowable. Consequently, the AO was directed to assess income at 8% of sales or the income returned in s. 153A proceedings, whichever was higher, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions/15% estimation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 08:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1411 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465622</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was estimation of business income where the AO, following a special audit under s. 142(2A), and the CIT(A) applied profit at 15% of gross sales and made/deleted allied expenditure adjustments. The ITAT held that, on the facts, a net profit rate of 8% on the declared gross sales was reasonable, and since income was estimated on a net basis, no further deductions for depreciation or interest were allowable. Consequently, the AO was directed to assess income at 8% of sales or the income returned in s. 153A proceedings, whichever was higher, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions/15% estimation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>