<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 737 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465613</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the Central Excise appeal and dismissed it without costs. The order records no substantive legal reasoning beyond the dismissal, so the operative effect is limited to affirmation of the lower outcome by refusal of interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 18:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 737 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465613</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the Central Excise appeal and dismissed it without costs. The order records no substantive legal reasoning beyond the dismissal, so the operative effect is limited to affirmation of the lower outcome by refusal of interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>