<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 172 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49074</link>
    <description>Remission of duty under Rule 196 applies only where goods in transit are lost or destroyed by natural causes or unavoidable accidents, and not where the alleged shortage from missing railway wagons is unproven or attributable to causes within human control; the remission claim was rejected and the demand sustained. On the excess wagons issue, receipt without a proper invoice was not finally quantified on the existing record, and the assessee was allowed to produce AR3A and related documents for verification and possible adjustment against any corresponding short receipt; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:08:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 172 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49074</link>
      <description>Remission of duty under Rule 196 applies only where goods in transit are lost or destroyed by natural causes or unavoidable accidents, and not where the alleged shortage from missing railway wagons is unproven or attributable to causes within human control; the remission claim was rejected and the demand sustained. On the excess wagons issue, receipt without a proper invoice was not finally quantified on the existing record, and the assessee was allowed to produce AR3A and related documents for verification and possible adjustment against any corresponding short receipt; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>