https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465611 Rule 39 of the Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 allows the Code of Civil Procedure to apply, as far as may be, to proceedings under Article 226 where the Rules are silent, so an application for appointment of a receiver under Order XL Rule 1 CPC was maintainable in a writ petition. Section 48-C of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act also permits interim relief in the nature of injunction or receiver in appropriate proceedings. However, the pleadings did not disclose circumstances justifying the extraordinary remedy of a receiver; at most, they supported interim injunction relief. The requested receiver was therefore not warranted on the facts. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jan 2026 14:36:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465611 Rule 39 of the Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 allows the Code of Civil Procedure to apply, as far as may be, to proceedings under Article 226 where the Rules are silent, so an application for appointment of a receiver under Order XL Rule 1 CPC was maintainable in a writ petition. Section 48-C of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act also permits interim relief in the nature of injunction or receiver in appropriate proceedings. However, the pleadings did not disclose circumstances justifying the extraordinary remedy of a receiver; at most, they supported interim injunction relief. The requested receiver was therefore not warranted on the facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465611