<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment notices after insurance-sector search challenged as vague, non-speaking s.148A(3) order; remanded for fresh reasoned decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95647</link>
    <description>Validity of reassessment initiation was challenged on the ground that the order under s.148A(3) and the consequent notice under s.148 were vague and non-speaking, merely referring to a search in the insurance sector without disclosing why income was believed to have escaped assessment. The court held that the s.148A(3) order did not record any reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s replies or explain the basis for proceeding, rendering it unsustainable; consequently, the s.148A(3) order and the s.148 notice were set aside and the matter was remanded to the AO to pass a fresh, reasoned order after considering the replies, with clarification that the assessee had also asserted incomplete information in the notices. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment notices after insurance-sector search challenged as vague, non-speaking s.148A(3) order; remanded for fresh reasoned decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95647</link>
      <description>Validity of reassessment initiation was challenged on the ground that the order under s.148A(3) and the consequent notice under s.148 were vague and non-speaking, merely referring to a search in the insurance sector without disclosing why income was believed to have escaped assessment. The court held that the s.148A(3) order did not record any reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s replies or explain the basis for proceeding, rendering it unsustainable; consequently, the s.148A(3) order and the s.148 notice were set aside and the matter was remanded to the AO to pass a fresh, reasoned order after considering the replies, with clarification that the assessee had also asserted incomplete information in the notices. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>